Please take this quick survey to let me know how today went!
GET STARTED
Taking on a debate topic may seem like a daunting task! --
but there are several things to keep in mind to make it easier.
UNDERSTAND YOUR TOPIC
Say for your example that you have chosen to argue:
"The U.S. government should forgive student loans."
Consider:
DIAGRAM YOUR TOPIC: (optional, but recommended!)
Try diagramming your topic as a brainstorming exercise. This can be one way of thinking through the many different directions and conversations that you might want to incorporate in your arguments.
EXPLORE PROS & CONS:
Weekly reports focused on "hot topic" issues with summaries, viewpoint essays, and further reading.
Available on-campus only. Monthly “pro/con” reports focused on pending U.S. Congressional legislation and Supreme Court debates, with regular updates as issues evolve.
The following websites are also useful and generally-trustworthy sources for exploring the multiple sides of a debate:
CHECK THE NEWS:
Library Databases
Below are listed the main databases available at Holy Cross to locate current magazine and newspaper articles. Note that papers from different geographic areas might treat the same issues differently.
Local, national, and international news, including the Worcester Telegram & Gazette.
Date(s): 1980-present
Text-only articles from the Boston Globe.
Date(s): 1980-present
Text-only articles from the New York Times. **Blogs are not included.**
Current access to the New York Times site, including news, columns and more -- courtesy of the Holy Cross SGA. ** To access, create an account with your HC email address. If you already have an account, there will be an option to click-through to log in.
National newspapers, blogs and online news sites, including the Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, and Wall Street Journal.
On the Web
Depending on the geographic area involved, you may or may not find many articles in the Holy Cross collections that are helpful. At this point, you may want to venture out onto the web -- that's okay! Make sure to pay close attention to the sources you find, and think critically about how reliable they are. If you're not sure about a source, ask!
Here are a few places you might think about looking:
The Information Lifecycle helps us understand how information about an event, topic or idea might emerge and evolve over time.
Note that this timeline is just a general sense of the information lifecycle -- the exact timing can vary greatly from one discipline to another!
During your time at Holy Cross, you may find yourself using a combination of both popular and scholarly sources.
A popular resource is a resource for 'popular' consumption -- it has been written so that most people can easily read and understand it. This might include newspapers or magazines, some books, and some journals written for people in specific jobs. While there is usually an editor who checks these sources for good writing and for errors, this is mostly done by a single person rather than a group. Popular articles are usually written by journalists or professional writers, although sometimes they are written by experts on a specific topic.
Scholarly sources are written by experts on a particular subject (for example, a professor or other researcher). They also go through an extra process of review and approval by a group of other experts before they can be published. Usually, scholarly articles are written in 'academic-ese' and designed to be read by other scholars. You will probably find yourself using many scholarly sources in your other Holy Cross classes. However, because scholarly sources take a long time to be approved and published, they are not good sources for current news. Click here to explore the parts of a scholarly article as shown by the NC State Libraries.
How can you tell if you have a scholarly article in your hand?
The chart below compares the characteristics of scholarly vs. popular (non-scholarly) sources:
POPULAR | SCHOLARLY | |
---|---|---|
author | Usually staff writers and/or journalists | Experts on the topic -- usually researchers, scholars and/or professors |
audience | General public (for "popular" consumption) | Other experts (and students) in the field |
editing & review | Editor(s); generally concerned with grammar, style, etc., with some fact-checking | Other experts ("peer reviewed"); generally concerned with quality, thoroughness of research, strength of argument, etc. |
style & design |
Reasonably brief, typically uses colloquial if not informal language. Often illustrated with graphics, sidebars and other aesthetic elements. Sometimes accompanied by ads. |
More extensive in length; tends to be more formal and uses specialized vocabulary. Illustrations and charts are used only when furthering content. |
goal or purpose | To entertain; and/or, to share general information | To share findings, advance and argument and/or engage with other scholars |
sources | Few or none; if sources are used, there may not be formal citations. | Typically uses many sources, cited in detailed bibliographies, footnotes and/or endnotes |
examples | Time Magazine; Sports Illustrated; New Yorker; Boston Globe | Annual Review of Political Science; American Historical Review; Sociology of Education |
No matter what you're researching or what kinds of information you're working with, you should always interrogate your sources.
Lateral Reading is a more nuanced technique of evaluating websites and other kinds of sources.
While the questions on the previous page are a great place to start, sometimes you can't answer them completely -- or, sometimes, they don't give a complete picture of the information you are looking at.
The video below explains what lateral reading is, why it's important, and how to do it.
We've all heard the term "Fake News" -- even when information isn't blatantly or deliberately false, it's still a good idea to check the facts (see the video on Lateral Reading for more).
Not sure where to look? The page below offers some helpful resources for checking 'fact's of all kinds, from data to images: