Skip to Main Content
     

ENGL 243: Inter Crtv Nonfiction Workshop (Philip)

Class Resources

This page contains links to some of the journals and magazines you will need to access to find readings for class. It also contains some guidance on how to tell what type of resource you are looking at, since it can be hard to distinguish between popular and scholarly sources. If you find yourself unsure, feel free to contact a librarian and ask for help distinguishing the type of article you're reading!

Identifying & Evaluating Sources

 

During your time at Holy Cross, you may find yourself using a combination of both popular and scholarly sources. 

popular resource is a resource for 'popular' consumption -- it has been written so that most people can easily read and understand it. This might include newspapers or magazines, some books, and some journals written for people in specific jobs. While there is usually an editor who checks these sources for good writing and for errors, this is mostly done by a single person rather than a group. Popular articles are usually written by journalists or professional writers, although sometimes they are written by experts on a specific topic. 

Scholarly sources are written by experts on a particular subject (for example, a professor or other researcher). They also go through an extra process of review and approval by a group of other experts before they can be published. Usually, scholarly articles are written in 'academic-ese', meaning they are full of technical jargon, and designed to be read by other scholars. You will probably find yourself using many scholarly sources in your other Holy Cross classes. However, because scholarly sources take a long time to be approved and published, they are not good sources for current news.  You will usually find academic articles published in professional journals, which are often behind paywalls and hard to access freely outside of university settings.

No matter what you're researching or what kinds of information you're working with, you should always interrogate your sources. Situate your source within the context of the timeline, the audience, the content, etc. Think of it like doing a background check! 

How to Spot Fake News Infographic. CONSIDER THE SOURCE Click away from the story to investigate the site, its mission and its contact info. READ BEYOND Headlines can be outrageous in an effort to get clicks. What’s the whole story? CHECK THE AUTHOR Do a quick search on the author. Are they credible? Are they real? SUPPORTING SOURCES? Click on those links. Determine if the info given actually supports the story. CHECK THE DATE Reposting old news stories doesn’t mean they’re relevant to current events. IS IT A JOKE? If it is too outlandish, it might be satire. Research the site and author to be sure. CHECK YOUR BIASES Consider if your own beliefs could affect your judgement. ASK THE EXPERTS Ask a librarian, or consult a fact-checking site.

Photo of a worksheet titled "source checklist". Text on the image reads "Author Who is the author? How is the author qualified? Is the author an expert? Does the author have bias? (Remember that a bias may not be directly stated.) Be wary if you cannot determine an author or group responsible for the content you are reading! Host or Publisher Who hosts the site? OR Who publishes this resource?  What is their purpose and audience?  Does the host/publisher have bias?  (Remember that a bias may not be directly stated.)  What is the domain extension?  The publisher and/or domain can help you determine how reputable a website is. For example, .gov is the domain for United States government sites and .edu is for US Educational institutions. Note that not all .com sites are unreliable and not all .org sites are reputable -- .org simply means that the website is for a non-profit group. Source Does the resource provide its sources? Does it refer/link you to other credible sources? Is the information able to be cross-referenced? Currency  Is the site regularly updated?    When was it published?   Is there any information which seems out-of-date?