Open the Scholarly Article Exploration Google Doc and find your group number.
Follow the link to your source and answer the questions. Keep in mind that you are not expected to read the source from start to finish - the worksheet will prompt you to look at specific sections.
When everyone is done, each group will share what they discussed. Your group should agree on one person to be the speaker for your group.
Cidro, J., Doenmez, C., Sinclair, S., Nychuk, A., Wodtke, L., & Hayward, A. (2021). Putting them on a strong spiritual path: Indigenous doulas responding to the needs of Indigenous mothers and communities. International Journal for Equity in Health, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01521-3
Harrington, E. E., & Reese-Melancon, C. (2022). Who is responsible for remembering? Everyday prospective memory demands in parenthood. Sex Roles, 86(3–4), 189-207–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01264-
Stahnke, B., Cooley, M. E., & Blackstone, A. (2023). A systematic review of life satisfaction experiences among childfree adults. Family Journal, 31(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807221104795
Read the below article and create a brief (no more than 4 sentences) annotation. This is meant to get you thinking about what to look for when annotating sources - it does not have to be perfect!
Hida, H. & Yoon, J. (2022, September 1). In a Japanese nursing home, some workers are babies. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/01/world/asia/japan-nursing-home-babies.html
(If the direct link doesn't work, find a PDF copy here: PDF Link)
Questions to guide your reading:
1. Who wrote this? What are their qualifications?
2. What is the main argument or main idea?
3. What do you want to remember about the source?
Once you have created your annotation, swap annotations with a partner and compare. See what is similar and different about your annotations.