Skip to Main Content
     

A Guide To...Academic Honesty and Academic Integrity

Academic Integrity

Academic Honesty means being honest and ethical about the way that you do academic work. This includes citing and acknowledging when you borrow from the work of others. As Holy Cross students, you are required to follow the College's Academic Honesty policy. 

Excerpt from the College policy: 

All education is a cooperative enterprise between faculty and students. This cooperation requires trust and mutual respect, which are only possible in an environment governed by the principles of academic honesty. As an institution devoted to teaching, learning, and intellectual inquiry, Holy Cross expects all members of the College community to abide by the highest standards of
academic integrity. Any violation of academic honesty undermines the student-faculty relationship, thereby wounding the whole community. The principal violations of academic honesty are plagiarism, cheating, and collusion.

It is the responsibility of students, independent of the faculty’s responsibility, to understand the proper methods of using and quoting from source materials (as explained in standard handbooks such as The Little Brown Handbook and the Harbrace College Handbook), and to take credit only for work they have completed through their own individual efforts within the guidelines established by the faculty.

Avoiding Academic Dishonesty

Always cite...

  • Exact quotations from another source; 
  • Information summarized or paraphrased from another source [even websites]
  • Information received from other people, for example during an interview or oral history; 
  • Graphs, illustrations, or other visual information created by someone else  [even from a website]
  • Video and audio recordings created by someone else [even from a website]

In general, you should always cite facts, ideas or words that you did not create yourself. 

You usually don't have to cite... 

  • Your personal life experiences; 
  • Ideas that are entirely your own; 
  • Results from lab or field experiments that you conducted yourself;  
  • Images, music or other media that you created yourself; 
  • Information that is considered “common knowledge” (facts or ideas that most people will know, and that you can find in many places without a citation). 

When in doubt, it's always better to cite. 

'"Should I Cite This?' A Visual Guide from the Purdue OWL." Purdue Online Writing Lab,
 owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/using_research/documents/20200617ShouldICiteChart.jpg. Accessed 9 Aug 2024.

 

Practicing good research hygiene helps prevent accidental academic dishonesty! 
 

Take good notes. 

  • Before writing a note, read the original text until you understand what it is saying. It's okay if you have to read it several times! 
  • Use quotation marks whenever you copy exact phrasing. 
  • Record the source for each quotation or piece of information (including page numbers) as you go. 

Make sure that you... 

  • Keep track of which quotes and information came from which source; 
  • Note page numbers and other detailed directions so that you can find the information again later; 
  • Record all of the information you need to cite each source that you consult, even if you're not sure yet if you'll use it. 


Use a variety of sources in your research. 

This helps make sure you aren't relying too much on one author's ideas and writing. 
If you are having trouble finding enough different sources, ask a librarian for helphttp://libguides.holycross.edu/ask


Be careful when using AI generators. 

In many cases, using language written for you by an AI generator like ChatGPT -- even if you've only asked ChatGPT to edit your own writing -- can be considered academic dishonesty. Some professors will allow you to use AI generators in certain approved ways, and others will forbid it entirely. Make sure you are familiar with the individual professor's policies on AI, and ask for clarification if needed. 


Leave enough time to do your research and writing

If you are rushing to finish your paper, you are more likely to accidentally plagiarize or forget a citation. In most cases, it's far better to ask your professor if they will consider an extension. 


To the extent possible, cite as you write. 

It's okay to leave your full bibliography for later in the process - but as you are writing, make sure that you are noting when you include information that needs to be fully cited later. At the very least, try to create a temporary citation with author and page number so that you can go back later. 

Don't assume you will be able to remember which words are your own and which are paraphrased or quoted -- it's easy to lose track! 

The Scholarly Conversation

College policy and definitions

Academic Honesty Policy

-accessed 4/1/2019 from https://www.holycross.edu/sites/default/files/Registrar/academic_integrity_policy.pdf

All education is a cooperative enterprise between faculty and students. This cooperation requires trust and mutual respect, which are only possible in an environment governed by the principles of academic honesty. As an institution devoted to teaching, learning, and intellectual inquiry, Holy Cross expects all members of the College community to abide by the highest standards of
academic integrity. Any violation of academic honesty undermines the student-faculty relationship, thereby wounding the whole community. The principal violations of academic honesty are plagiarism, cheating, and collusion.

Plagiarism is the act of taking the words, ideas, data, illustrative material, or statements of someone else, without full and proper acknowledgment, and presenting them as one’s own.

Cheating is the use of improper means or subterfuge to gain credit or advantage. Forms of cheating include the use, attempted use, or improper possession of unauthorized aids in any examination or other academic exercise submitted for evaluation; the fabrication or falsification of data; misrepresentation of academic or extracurricular credentials; and deceitful performance on placement examinations. It is also cheating to submit the same work for credit in more than one course, except as authorized in advance by the course instructors.
Collusion is assisting or attempting to assist another student in an act of academic dishonesty.

At the beginning of each course, the faculty should address the students on academic integrity and how it applies to the assignments for the course. The faculty should also make every effort, through vigilance and through the nature of the assignments, to discourage and prevent dishonesty in any form. It is the responsibility of students, independent of the faculty’s responsibility, to understand the proper methods of using and quoting from source materials (as explained in standard handbooks such as The Little Brown Handbook and the Harbrace College Handbook), and to take credit only for work they have completed through their own individual efforts within the guidelines established by the faculty.

The faculty member who observes or suspects academic dishonesty should first discuss the incident with the student. The very nature of the faculty-student relationship requires both that the faculty member treat the student fairly and that the student responds honestly to the faculty’s questions concerning the integrity of his or her work. If the faculty is convinced that the student is guilty of academic dishonesty, he or she shall impose an appropriate sanction in the form of a grade reduction or failing grade on the assignment in question and/or shall assign compensatory course work. The sanction may reflect the seriousness of the dishonesty and the faculty’s assessment of the student’s intent. In all instances where a faculty member does impose a grade penalty because of academic dishonesty, he or she must submit a written report to the Chair or Director of the department and the Class Dean. This written report must be submitted within a week of the faculty member’s determination that the policy on academic honesty has been violated. This report shall include a description of the assignment (and any related materials, such as guidelines, syllabus entries, written instructions, and the like that are relevant to the assignment), the evidence used to support the complaint, and a summary of the conversation between the student and the faculty member regarding the complaint. The Class Dean will then inform the student in writing that a charge of dishonesty has been made and of his or her right to have the charge reviewed. A copy of this letter will be sent to the student’s parents or guardians. The student will also receive a copy of the complaint and all supporting materials submitted by the professor. The student’s request for a formal review must be made in writing to the Class Dean within one week of the notification of the charge. The written statement must include a description of the student’s position concerning the charge by the faculty. A review panel consisting of a ClassDean, the Chair or Director of the department of the faculty member involved (or a senior member of the same department if the Chair or Director is the complainant), and an additional faculty member selected by the Chair or Director from the same department, shall convene within two weeks to investigate the charge and review the student’s statement, meeting separately with the student and the faculty member involved. The Chair or Director of the complainant’s department (or the alternate) shall chair the panel and communicate the panel’s decision to the student’s Class Dean. If the panel finds by majority vote that the charge of dishonesty is supported, the faculty member’s initial written report to the Class Dean shall be placed in the student’s file until graduation, at which time it shall be removed and destroyed unless a second offense occurs. If a majority of the panel finds that the charge of dishonesty is not supported, the faculty member’s initial complaint shall be destroyed, and the assignment in question shall be graded on its merits by the faculty member. The Class Dean shall inform the student promptly of the decision made. This information will be sent to the student’s parents or guardians. The Class Dean may extend all notification deadlines above for compelling reasons. He or she will notify all parties in writing of any extensions. Each instance of academic dishonesty reported to the Class Dean (provided that the charge of dishonesty is upheld following a possible review, as described above) shall result in an administrative penalty in addition to the penalty imposed by the faculty member.

For a first instance of academic dishonesty, the penalty shall be academic probation effective immediately and continuing for the next two consecutive semesters. For a second instance, the penalty shall be academic suspension for two consecutive semesters. For a third instance, the penalty shall be dismissal from the College. Dismissal from the College shall also be the penalty for any instance of academic dishonesty that occurs while a student is on probation because of a prior instance of dishonesty. Multiple charges of academic dishonesty filed at or about the same time shall result in a one-year suspension if the student is not and has not been on probation for a prior instance of dishonesty. Multiple charges of academic dishonesty filed at or about the same time shall result in a dismissal if the student has ever been on probation for a prior instance of dishonesty. Suspension and dismissal are effective at the conclusion of the semester in which the violation of the policy occurred. Students may appeal a suspension or dismissal for reasons of academic dishonesty to the Committee on Academic Standing, which may uphold the penalty, overturn it, or substitute a lesser penalty. A penalty of dismissal, if upheld by the Committee, may be appealed to the President of the College.